TECHNICAL / AUDIT EVIDENCE
{
"record": {
"id": "98042d6e-f8b0-486a-96ae-91b8dddf1f7d",
"canonical_key": "commercial-opportunity:v1:b68127fd-c269-41bf-ac73-281ca2c7c5b8",
"organisation_id": "f80148a3-a7ce-4b91-ad8e-c353f6882238",
"origin_engine": "TENDER",
"origin_signal_id": "b68127fd-c269-41bf-ac73-281ca2c7c5b8",
"relationship_type": "PUBLIC_BUYER",
"what_happened": "Tender notice from University Of Edinburgh. Relevance is supported by notice evidence.",
"why_it_matters": "Evidence strength, addressability and route are evaluated independently of relationship.",
"potential_need": "MEWP inspection and service",
"current_product_match_json": "[\"MEWP inspection and service\"]",
"capability_match_json": "[{\"capability_id\":\"MEWP\",\"confidence\":\"MEDIUM\",\"currently_sold\":\"YES\",\"name\":\"MEWP inspection and service\"}]",
"new_product_possibility": "NO",
"value_truth": "UNKNOWN",
"value_band": "UNKNOWN",
"probability": "MEDIUM",
"urgency": "BACKGROUND",
"confidence": "MEDIUM",
"evidence_json": "{\"independent_identities\":[\"ocds-h6vhtk-061509\"],\"signal_id\":\"b68127fd-c269-41bf-ac73-281ca2c7c5b8\",\"source\":\"find_a_tender_ocds\"}",
"facts_json": "{\"award_values\":[],\"buyer\":\"University Of Edinburgh\",\"buyer_reference\":\"EC1077\",\"contact_email\":\"sglynn2@ed.ac.uk\",\"contact_name\":\"Steven Glynn\",\"contact_restrictions\":[],\"contacts\":[{\"email\":\"sglynn2@ed.ac.uk\",\"name\":\"Steven Glynn\",\"organisation\":\"University Of Edinburgh\",\"telephone\":\"+44 1316502759\",\"url\":\"https://www.publictendersscotland.publiccontractsscotland.gov.uk/go/8599597501A0867DF3C2\"}],\"contract_terms\":[{\"durationInDays\":720},{\"durationInDays\":720}],\"cpv\":[{\"description\":\"Accommodation, building and window cleaning services\",\"id\":\"90911000\",\"scheme\":\"CPV\"}],\"currency\":\"GBP\",\"days_to_deadline\":-2,\"deadline\":\"2026-10-12T12:00:00+01:00\",\"deadline_conflict\":false,\"deadline_kind\":\"TENDER\",\"deadline_narrative\":\"\",\"deadline_structured\":\"2026-10-12T12:00:00+01:00\",\"deadline_time_unpublished\":false,\"demo_evidence\":[\"Predominant cleaning method is expected to be reach and wash, however some buildings will require alternative access methods such as rope access/abseiling and MEWPs, and bidders must demonstrate capability to deliver these safely and compliantly.\"],\"direct_contact_evidence\":[],\"engagement_route\":\"\",\"estimated_value\":560000,\"expansion_scope\":\"Complete official OCDS release; linked restricted documents require separate verification.\",\"extensions\":[{\"description\":\"There will be two optional 1 year extensions to be taken at the Universities discretion\"},{\"description\":\"There will be two optional 1 year extensions to be taken at the Universities discretion.\"}],\"fully_expanded\":true,\"geographic_scope\":[[{\"region\":\"UKM75\"}],[{\"region\":\"UKM75\"}]],\"hidden_opportunity\":true,\"historical_engagement_evidence\":\"\",\"incumbent_evidence\":[],\"linked_documents\":[],\"lot_count\":2,\"lot_scope\":[{\"description\":\"It is proposed this procurement will be conducted through the use of the Restricted Procedure.\\nThe evaluation process shall be as follows.\\nStage 1- Pre-Qualification via the submission of the completed SPD (Scotland).\\nBidders must pass the minimum standards (pass/fail) sections of the SPD (Scotland). These can be found within the qualification envelope of PCS-T. Statements detailing the specific requirements can be found within Section III 1.1, 1.2 & 1.3 and of the Contract Notice. Bidders must complete the technical envelope in PCS-T. The responses to these statements will be scored as per the scoring methodology. SPD Technical Envelope Scores shall be allocated based on the total percentage achieved by the response out of the maximum possible percentage. This takes into account the score out of 4 and the weighting allocated to individual questions. For example, if a question is weighted 10 percent and your submission scores 3 points out of 4 for that question then you will receive 7.5 percent out of a possible 10 percent.\\nA 50%minimum threshold will apply, whereby only bidders achieving a total score greater or equal to 50% for their responses to the SPD scored questions will be considered for shortlisting. The top six (6) Bidders based on the scored questions will be invited to submit a bid in response to the subsequent Invitation to Tender (ITT). Where the number of bidders meeting the selection criteria is below the minimum number, the University may continue the procedure by inviting the candidates with the required capabilities. In any event, the number of candidates invited shall be sufficient to ensure genuine competition at ITT stage.\\nStage 2- Invitation to Tender (ITT)\\nThe University will evaluate all shortlisted bidders\\u2019 ITT submissions via undertaking a Technical and Commercial evaluation. The ITT will be weighted at 60% Technical and 40% Commercial. The weightings of each technical question will be detailed within the ITT. Technical Scores shall be allocated based on the total percentage achieved by the response out of the maximum possible percentage. This takes into account the score out of 4 and the weighting allocated to individual questions. For example, if a question is weighted 10% and your submission scores 3 points out of 4 for that question then you will receive 7.5% out of a possible 10%. A60%minimum technical threshold will apply (48% after technical weightings are applied).\\nEach bidder achieving a score greater or equal to 50% will only then progress through to the commercial evaluation. For the Commercial evaluation, the Bidder who submits the lowest-cost bid will be awarded the maximum score and others will be awarded a pro rata score in relation to the lowest bid. The technical and commercial scores will then be combined to give each bidder an overall total score and to calculate the winning bidder. Bidders can choose to bid for either one or both Lots. Where a bidder opts to bid for both Lots, they will need to state their preference between Lot 1 and Lot 2. The top scoring Bidder will be appointed to each Lot.\",\"id\":\"2\",\"title\":\"Estates\",\"value\":null},{\"description\":\"It is proposed this procurement will be conducted through the use of the Restricted Procedure.\\nThe evaluation process shall be as follows.\\nStage 1- Pre-Qualification via the submission of the completed SPD (Scotland).\\nBidders must pass the minimum standards (pass/fail) sections of the SPD (Scotland). These can be found within the qualification envelope of PCS-T. Statements detailing the specific requirements can be found within Section III 1.1, 1.2 & 1.3 and of the Contract Notice. Bidders must complete the technical envelope in PCS-T. The responses to these statements will be scored as per the scoring methodology. SPD Technical Envelope Scores shall be allocated based on the total percentage achieved by the response out of the maximum possible percentage. This takes into account the score out of 4 and the weighting allocated to individual questions. For example, if a question is weighted 10 percent and your submission scores 3 points out of 4 for that question then you will receive 7.5 percent out of a possible 10 percent.\\nA 50%minimum threshold will apply, whereby only bidders achieving a total score greater or equal to 50% for their responses to the SPD scored questions will be considered for shortlisting. The top six (6) Bidders based on the scored questions will be invited to submit a bid in response to the subsequent Invitation to Tender (ITT). Where the number of bidders meeting the selection criteria is below the minimum number, the University may continue the procedure by inviting the candidates with the required capabilities. In any event, the number of candidates invited shall be sufficient to ensure genuine competition at ITT stage.\\nStage 2- Invitation to Tender (ITT)\\nThe University will evaluate all shortlisted bidders\\u2019 ITT submissions via undertaking a Technical and Commercial evaluation. The ITT will be weighted at 60% Technical and 40% Commercial. The weightings of each technical question will be detailed within the ITT. Technical Scores shall be allocated based on the total percentage achieved by the response out of the maximum possible percentage. This takes into account the score out of 4 and the weighting allocated to individual questions. For example, if a question is weighted 10% and your submission scores 3 points out of 4 for that question then you will receive 7.5% out of a possible 10%. A60%minimum technical threshold will apply (48% after technical weightings are applied).\\nEach bidder achieving a score greater or equal to 50% will only then progress through to the commercial evaluation. For the Commercial evaluation, the Bidder who submits the lowest-cost bid will be awarded the maximum score and others will be awarded a pro rata score in relation to the lowest bid. The technical and commercial scores will then be combined to give each bidder an overall total score and to calculate the winning bidder. Bidders can choose to bid for either one or both Lots. Where a bidder opts to bid for both Lots, they will need to state their preference between Lot 1 and Lot 2. The top scoring Bidder will be appointed to each Lot.\",\"id\":\"1\",\"title\":\"Accommodation, Catering and Events\",\"value\":null}],\"meeting_evidence\":[\"Where the number of bidders meeting the selection criteria is below the minimum number, the University may continue the procedure by inviting the candidates with the required capabilities.\"],\"notice_type\":\"TENDER\",\"procurement_method\":\"Restricted procedure\",\"procurement_status\":\"active\",\"publication_date\":\"2026-09-10T09:13:06+01:00\",\"published_corrections\":[],\"published_notice_types\":[],\"published_requirement\":\"The University of Edinburgh will shortly be going out to tender via a Restricted Procedure to engage suitably qualified, resourced and experienced suppliers to provide window cleaning services across the estate.\\nThe University of Edinburgh is procuring window cleaning services across a large and diverse estate, including historic listed buildings and modern facilities, spanning multiple campus locations. The requirement is for a prompt, efficient and consistently high-quality service delivered year-round (52 weeks), with capacity to flex to changing priorities and emerging needs. Suppliers are expected to work collaboratively with University representatives and operate in a way that minimises disruption, as many buildings will be occupied during service delivery.\\nWindow cleaning requirements include both planned/programmed cleans and reactive/short-notice cleans. For planned works, cleaning will be scheduled in advance and must be delivered to agreed timescales, with early notification to the University if issues arise that may affect delivery. For reactive requests, the University requires a same working day response to enquiries, with a quotation and agreed delivery timescales within 24 hours. Predominant cleaning method is expected to be reach and wash, however some buildings will require alternative access methods such as rope access/abseiling and MEWPs, and bidders must demonstrate capability to deliver these safely and compliantly.\\nA key operational feature is significant peak demand during defined periods, with a requirement for sufficient staffing, vehicles and equipment to deliver high volumes within short timescales. Quality sign-off is required following completion of cleans (by the University\\u2019s nominated representative). Contractors are responsible for taking due care of University fixtures and fittings and must report any defects discovered (e.g., broken or defective windows, hinges, safety catches) and any accidental damage immediately, in line with contract reporting procedures.\",\"questionnaire_evidence\":[],\"reference\":\"085639-2026\",\"registration_evidence\":[],\"relevance_evidence\":{\"MEWP\":[\"mewp\"]},\"requirement_items\":\"\\n\\nIt is proposed this procurement will be conducted through the use of the Restricted Procedure.\\nThe evaluation process shall be as follows.\\nStage 1- Pre-Qualification via the submission of the completed SPD (Scotland).\\nBidders must pass the minimum standards (pass/fail) sections of the SPD (Scotland). These can be found within the qualification envelope of PCS-T. Statements detailing the specific requirements can be found within Section III 1.1, 1.2 & 1.3 and of the Contract Notice. Bidders must complete the technical envelope in PCS-T. The responses to these statements will be scored as per the scoring methodology. SPD Technical Envelope Scores shall be allocated based on the total percentage achieved by the response out of the maximum possible percentage. This takes into account the score out of 4 and the weighting allocated to individual questions. For example, if a question is weighted 10 percent and your submission scores 3 points out of 4 for that question then you will receive 7.5 percent out of a possible 10 percent.\\nA 50%minimum threshold will apply, whereby only bidders achieving a total score greater or equal to 50% for their responses to the SPD scored questions will be considered for shortlisting. The top six (6) Bidders based on the scored questions will be invited to submit a bid in response to the subsequent Invitation to Tender (ITT). Where the number of bidders meeting the selection criteria is below the minimum number, the University may continue the procedure by inviting the candidates with the required capabilities. In any event, the number of candidates invited shall be sufficient to ensure genuine competition at ITT stage.\\nStage 2- Invitation to Tender (ITT)\\nThe University will evaluate all shortlisted bidders\\u2019 ITT submissions via undertaking a Technical and Commercial evaluation. The ITT will be weighted at 60% Technical and 40% Commercial. The weightings of each technical question will be detailed within the ITT. Technical Scores shall be allocated based on the total percentage achieved by the response out of the maximum possible percentage. This takes into account the score out of 4 and the weighting allocated to individual questions. For example, if a question is weighted 10% and your submission scores 3 points out of 4 for that question then you will receive 7.5% out of a possible 10%. A60%minimum technical threshold will apply (48% after technical weightings are applied).\\nEach bidder achieving a score greater or equal to 50% will only then progress through to the commercial evaluation. For the Commercial evaluation, the Bidder who submits the lowest-cost bid will be awarded the maximum score and others will be awarded a pro rata score in relation to the lowest bid. The technical and commercial scores will then be combined to give each bidder an overall total score and to calculate the winning bidder. Bidders can choose to bid for either one or both Lots. Where a bidder opts to bid for both Lots, they will need to state their preference between Lot 1 and Lot 2. The top scoring Bidder will be appointed to each Lot.\\nIt is proposed this procurement will be conducted through the use of the Restricted Procedure.\\nThe evaluation process shall be as follows.\\nStage 1- Pre-Qualification via the submission of the completed SPD (Scotland).\\nBidders must pass the minimum standards (pass/fail) sections of the SPD (Scotland). These can be found within the qualification envelope of PCS-T. Statements detailing the specific requirements can be found within Section III 1.1, 1.2 & 1.3 and of the Contract Notice. Bidders must complete the technical envelope in PCS-T. The responses to these statements will be scored as per the scoring methodology. SPD Technical Envelope Scores shall be allocated based on the total percentage achieved by the response out of the maximum possible percentage. This takes into account the score out of 4 and the weighting allocated to individual questions. For example, if a question is weighted 10 percent and your submission scores 3 points out of 4 for that question then you will receive 7.5 percent out of a possible 10 percent.\\nA 50%minimum threshold will apply, whereby only bidders achieving a total score greater or equal to 50% for their responses to the SPD scored questions will be considered for shortlisting. The top six (6) Bidders based on the scored questions will be invited to submit a bid in response to the subsequent Invitation to Tender (ITT). Where the number of bidders meeting the selection criteria is below the minimum number, the University may continue the procedure by inviting the candidates with the required capabilities. In any event, the number of candidates invited shall be sufficient to ensure genuine competition at ITT stage.\\nStage 2- Invitation to Tender (ITT)\\nThe University will evaluate all shortlisted bidders\\u2019 ITT submissions via undertaking a Technical and Commercial evaluation. The ITT will be weighted at 60% Technical and 40% Commercial. The weightings of each technical question will be detailed within the ITT. Technical Scores shall be allocated based on the total percentage achieved by the response out of the maximum possible percentage. This takes into account the score out of 4 and the weighting allocated to individual questions. For example, if a question is weighted 10% and your submission scores 3 points out of 4 for that question then you will receive 7.5% out of a possible 10%. A60%minimum technical threshold will apply (48% after technical weightings are applied).\\nEach bidder achieving a score greater or equal to 50% will only then progress through to the commercial evaluation. For the Commercial evaluation, the Bidder who submits the lowest-cost bid will be awarded the maximum score and others will be awarded a pro rata score in relation to the lowest bid. The technical and commercial scores will then be combined to give each bidder an overall total score and to calculate the winning bidder. Bidders can choose to bid for either one or both Lots. Where a bidder opts to bid for both Lots, they will need to state their preference between Lot 1 and Lot 2. The top scoring Bidder will be appointed to each Lot.\",\"selection_requirements\":{\"criteria\":[{\"appliesTo\":[\"supplier\"],\"description\":\"SPD Statement 4B.1.1\\nBidders will be required to have a \\u201cgeneral\\u201d yearly turnover threshold of 85033.12 GBP for Lot 1, 176607.26 GBP for Lot 2 and 261640.38 GBP for both lots combined.\\nSPD 4B.5.1 and 4B.5.2 Statement\\nIt is a requirement of this contract that bidders hold, or can commit to obtain prior to the commencement of any subsequently awarded\\ncontract, the types and levels of insurance indicated below:\\nNote: There is no requirement for separate product liability insurance as the monetary value detailed against public liability insurance is\\ninclusive of both types of insurance.\\nEmployer\\u2019s (Compulsory) Liability Insurance = 10 million GBP per single event\\nPublic Liability Insurance = 5 million GBP per single event\\nProfessional Indemnity Insurance = 2 million GBP per single even\",\"type\":\"economic\"},{\"appliesTo\":[\"supplier\"],\"description\":\"SPD 4C.1.2- Statement 1\\nProvide two (2) examples of window cleaning contracts delivered within the last five (5) years that demonstrate your ability to deliver services across varied building types, including working at height. Examples may include ladder work and rope access where relevant.\\nMandatory information for each example (basis of evaluation/scoring):\\n- Scope/scale (sites/buildings)\\n- Building types and access constraints\\n- Methods used (high level)\\n- H&S controls (high level)\\n- Quality checking/rectification\\n- Scheduling and communications with client/occupants\\n- Operational challenges and how managed.\\nWeight: 50% overall (Each example is worth 25%).\\nSPD 4C.1.2- Statement 2\\nProvide two (2) examples of window cleaning contracts delivered within the last five (5) years that demonstrate your ability to deliver services across varied building types, including working at height. Examples may include ladder work and rope access where relevant.\\nMandatory information for each example (basis of evaluation/scoring):\\n- Scope/scale (sites/buildings)\\n- Building types and access constraints\\n- Methods used (high level)\\n- H&S controls (high level)\\n- Quality checking/rectification\\n- Scheduling and communications with client/occupants\\n- Operational challenges and how managed..\\nWeight: 25%\\nRecruitment, Training & Competence (Working at Height)\\nDescribe your approach to recruitment, training and competence management for window cleaning operatives and supervisors, including assessment of working at height (using the HSE WAH hierarchy) controls for working at height (ladder and rope access if applicable), supervision/monitoring of safe systems of work, and management of agency/temporary staff (if used). Do not include site-specific staffing numbers.\\nWeight:25%\\nService Reliability, Quality Control & Customer Communication Describe how you ensure reliable service delivery and consistent quality over the contract term, including: planning/scheduling (including weather-related impacts), attendance control, quality assurance (inspection regime, snagging/rectification), client communications and sign-off, issue/complaint handling and escalation, and contingency arrangements for short-notice cover (staff or equipment). Do not provide a mobilisation plan (to be requested at ITT).\\nWeight:25%\",\"type\":\"technical\"}]},\"sme_suitability\":[],\"submission_method\":\"https://www.publictendersscotland.publiccontractsscotland.gov.uk/go/8599597501A0867DF3C2\",\"value_excluding_vat\":null,\"value_including_vat\":null,\"value_minimum\":null,\"value_scope\":\"TOTAL_NOTICE_NOT_PURA_ADDRESSABLE\",\"vat_basis\":\"VAT basis not explicit in release\"}",
"inferences_json": "[{\"basis\":{\"MEWP\":[\"mewp\"]},\"type\":\"HIDDEN_ADDRESSABLE_ELEMENT\"}]",
"unknowns_json": "[]",
"recommended_action": "TRACK UNTIL TENDER",
"route_to_market": "TENDER_FRAMEWORK",
"time_to_revenue": "WEEKS",
"ranking_json": "{\"delivery_fit\":3,\"effort\":3,\"evidence_confidence\":2,\"probability\":2,\"relationship_leverage\":1,\"repeatability\":1,\"risk_adjusted\":8,\"time_to_revenue\":3,\"value\":0}",
"status": "EVIDENCED",
"feedback_state": "NONE",
"related_signals_json": "[\"b68127fd-c269-41bf-ac73-281ca2c7c5b8\"]",
"related_tenders_json": "[\"b68127fd-c269-41bf-ac73-281ca2c7c5b8\"]",
"related_contracts_json": "[]",
"provenance_json": "{\"derivation\":\"opportunity-evidence-v2\",\"parent_signal\":\"b68127fd-c269-41bf-ac73-281ca2c7c5b8\"}",
"data_mode": "LIVE",
"content_digest": "4b39ebe1ca4e9be1f0c1c250036a07a0349570e755a6581330f14e464a8c4e0a",
"created_at": "2026-10-14T03:00:19+00:00",
"updated_at": "2026-11-05T10:00:25+00:00",
"opportunity_kind": "COMPANY_SPECIFIC",
"addressability": "DIRECTLY_ADDRESSABLE",
"total_value_truth": "KNOWN",
"total_value_band": "HIGH",
"total_value_min": 560000.0,
"total_value_max": 560000.0,
"total_value_currency": "GBP",
"addressable_value_truth": "UNKNOWN",
"addressable_value_band": "UNKNOWN",
"addressable_value_min": null,
"addressable_value_max": null,
"addressable_value_currency": null,
"evidence_identity_count": 1,
"event_count": 1,
"organisation_count": 1,
"source_count": 1,
"first_evidence_at": "2026-09-10T08:13:06+00:00",
"last_evidence_at": "2026-09-10T08:13:06+00:00",
"evidence_recency": "AGING",
"contradictory_evidence_json": "[]",
"promotion_evidence_json": "[\"notice text directly evidences a matched Pura capability\"]",
"kill_evidence_json": "[\"source evidence withdrawn\",\"commercial fit contradicted\",\"route proven impossible\"]",
"recurring_revenue_type": "UNKNOWN",
"organisation": "University Of Edinburgh"
},
"signals": [
{
"id": "b68127fd-c269-41bf-ac73-281ca2c7c5b8",
"canonical_key": "find_a_tender_ocds:085639-2026",
"engine": "TENDER",
"organisation_id": "f80148a3-a7ce-4b91-ad8e-c353f6882238",
"signal_type": "TENDER",
"title": "Window Cleaning Services",
"summary": "Tender notice from University Of Edinburgh. Relevance is supported by notice evidence.",
"observed_at": "2026-10-14T03:00:17+00:00",
"event_at": "2026-09-10T09:13:06+01:00",
"source_id": "find_a_tender_ocds",
"source_reference": "085639-2026",
"source_url": "https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/085639-2026",
"source_permission": "PERMITTED_WITH_CONDITIONS",
"facts_json": "{\"award_values\":[],\"buyer\":\"University Of Edinburgh\",\"buyer_reference\":\"EC1077\",\"contact_email\":\"sglynn2@ed.ac.uk\",\"contact_name\":\"Steven Glynn\",\"contact_restrictions\":[],\"contacts\":[{\"email\":\"sglynn2@ed.ac.uk\",\"name\":\"Steven Glynn\",\"organisation\":\"University Of Edinburgh\",\"telephone\":\"+44 1316502759\",\"url\":\"https://www.publictendersscotland.publiccontractsscotland.gov.uk/go/8599597501A0867DF3C2\"}],\"contract_terms\":[{\"durationInDays\":720},{\"durationInDays\":720}],\"cpv\":[{\"description\":\"Accommodation, building and window cleaning services\",\"id\":\"90911000\",\"scheme\":\"CPV\"}],\"currency\":\"GBP\",\"days_to_deadline\":-2,\"deadline\":\"2026-10-12T12:00:00+01:00\",\"deadline_conflict\":false,\"deadline_kind\":\"TENDER\",\"deadline_narrative\":\"\",\"deadline_structured\":\"2026-10-12T12:00:00+01:00\",\"deadline_time_unpublished\":false,\"demo_evidence\":[\"Predominant cleaning method is expected to be reach and wash, however some buildings will require alternative access methods such as rope access/abseiling and MEWPs, and bidders must demonstrate capability to deliver these safely and compliantly.\"],\"direct_contact_evidence\":[],\"engagement_route\":\"\",\"estimated_value\":560000,\"expansion_scope\":\"Complete official OCDS release; linked restricted documents require separate verification.\",\"extensions\":[{\"description\":\"There will be two optional 1 year extensions to be taken at the Universities discretion\"},{\"description\":\"There will be two optional 1 year extensions to be taken at the Universities discretion.\"}],\"fully_expanded\":true,\"geographic_scope\":[[{\"region\":\"UKM75\"}],[{\"region\":\"UKM75\"}]],\"hidden_opportunity\":true,\"historical_engagement_evidence\":\"\",\"incumbent_evidence\":[],\"linked_documents\":[],\"lot_count\":2,\"lot_scope\":[{\"description\":\"It is proposed this procurement will be conducted through the use of the Restricted Procedure.\\nThe evaluation process shall be as follows.\\nStage 1- Pre-Qualification via the submission of the completed SPD (Scotland).\\nBidders must pass the minimum standards (pass/fail) sections of the SPD (Scotland). These can be found within the qualification envelope of PCS-T. Statements detailing the specific requirements can be found within Section III 1.1, 1.2 & 1.3 and of the Contract Notice. Bidders must complete the technical envelope in PCS-T. The responses to these statements will be scored as per the scoring methodology. SPD Technical Envelope Scores shall be allocated based on the total percentage achieved by the response out of the maximum possible percentage. This takes into account the score out of 4 and the weighting allocated to individual questions. For example, if a question is weighted 10 percent and your submission scores 3 points out of 4 for that question then you will receive 7.5 percent out of a possible 10 percent.\\nA 50%minimum threshold will apply, whereby only bidders achieving a total score greater or equal to 50% for their responses to the SPD scored questions will be considered for shortlisting. The top six (6) Bidders based on the scored questions will be invited to submit a bid in response to the subsequent Invitation to Tender (ITT). Where the number of bidders meeting the selection criteria is below the minimum number, the University may continue the procedure by inviting the candidates with the required capabilities. In any event, the number of candidates invited shall be sufficient to ensure genuine competition at ITT stage.\\nStage 2- Invitation to Tender (ITT)\\nThe University will evaluate all shortlisted bidders\\u2019 ITT submissions via undertaking a Technical and Commercial evaluation. The ITT will be weighted at 60% Technical and 40% Commercial. The weightings of each technical question will be detailed within the ITT. Technical Scores shall be allocated based on the total percentage achieved by the response out of the maximum possible percentage. This takes into account the score out of 4 and the weighting allocated to individual questions. For example, if a question is weighted 10% and your submission scores 3 points out of 4 for that question then you will receive 7.5% out of a possible 10%. A60%minimum technical threshold will apply (48% after technical weightings are applied).\\nEach bidder achieving a score greater or equal to 50% will only then progress through to the commercial evaluation. For the Commercial evaluation, the Bidder who submits the lowest-cost bid will be awarded the maximum score and others will be awarded a pro rata score in relation to the lowest bid. The technical and commercial scores will then be combined to give each bidder an overall total score and to calculate the winning bidder. Bidders can choose to bid for either one or both Lots. Where a bidder opts to bid for both Lots, they will need to state their preference between Lot 1 and Lot 2. The top scoring Bidder will be appointed to each Lot.\",\"id\":\"2\",\"title\":\"Estates\",\"value\":null},{\"description\":\"It is proposed this procurement will be conducted through the use of the Restricted Procedure.\\nThe evaluation process shall be as follows.\\nStage 1- Pre-Qualification via the submission of the completed SPD (Scotland).\\nBidders must pass the minimum standards (pass/fail) sections of the SPD (Scotland). These can be found within the qualification envelope of PCS-T. Statements detailing the specific requirements can be found within Section III 1.1, 1.2 & 1.3 and of the Contract Notice. Bidders must complete the technical envelope in PCS-T. The responses to these statements will be scored as per the scoring methodology. SPD Technical Envelope Scores shall be allocated based on the total percentage achieved by the response out of the maximum possible percentage. This takes into account the score out of 4 and the weighting allocated to individual questions. For example, if a question is weighted 10 percent and your submission scores 3 points out of 4 for that question then you will receive 7.5 percent out of a possible 10 percent.\\nA 50%minimum threshold will apply, whereby only bidders achieving a total score greater or equal to 50% for their responses to the SPD scored questions will be considered for shortlisting. The top six (6) Bidders based on the scored questions will be invited to submit a bid in response to the subsequent Invitation to Tender (ITT). Where the number of bidders meeting the selection criteria is below the minimum number, the University may continue the procedure by inviting the candidates with the required capabilities. In any event, the number of candidates invited shall be sufficient to ensure genuine competition at ITT stage.\\nStage 2- Invitation to Tender (ITT)\\nThe University will evaluate all shortlisted bidders\\u2019 ITT submissions via undertaking a Technical and Commercial evaluation. The ITT will be weighted at 60% Technical and 40% Commercial. The weightings of each technical question will be detailed within the ITT. Technical Scores shall be allocated based on the total percentage achieved by the response out of the maximum possible percentage. This takes into account the score out of 4 and the weighting allocated to individual questions. For example, if a question is weighted 10% and your submission scores 3 points out of 4 for that question then you will receive 7.5% out of a possible 10%. A60%minimum technical threshold will apply (48% after technical weightings are applied).\\nEach bidder achieving a score greater or equal to 50% will only then progress through to the commercial evaluation. For the Commercial evaluation, the Bidder who submits the lowest-cost bid will be awarded the maximum score and others will be awarded a pro rata score in relation to the lowest bid. The technical and commercial scores will then be combined to give each bidder an overall total score and to calculate the winning bidder. Bidders can choose to bid for either one or both Lots. Where a bidder opts to bid for both Lots, they will need to state their preference between Lot 1 and Lot 2. The top scoring Bidder will be appointed to each Lot.\",\"id\":\"1\",\"title\":\"Accommodation, Catering and Events\",\"value\":null}],\"meeting_evidence\":[\"Where the number of bidders meeting the selection criteria is below the minimum number, the University may continue the procedure by inviting the candidates with the required capabilities.\"],\"notice_type\":\"TENDER\",\"procurement_method\":\"Restricted procedure\",\"procurement_status\":\"active\",\"publication_date\":\"2026-09-10T09:13:06+01:00\",\"published_corrections\":[],\"published_notice_types\":[],\"published_requirement\":\"The University of Edinburgh will shortly be going out to tender via a Restricted Procedure to engage suitably qualified, resourced and experienced suppliers to provide window cleaning services across the estate.\\nThe University of Edinburgh is procuring window cleaning services across a large and diverse estate, including historic listed buildings and modern facilities, spanning multiple campus locations. The requirement is for a prompt, efficient and consistently high-quality service delivered year-round (52 weeks), with capacity to flex to changing priorities and emerging needs. Suppliers are expected to work collaboratively with University representatives and operate in a way that minimises disruption, as many buildings will be occupied during service delivery.\\nWindow cleaning requirements include both planned/programmed cleans and reactive/short-notice cleans. For planned works, cleaning will be scheduled in advance and must be delivered to agreed timescales, with early notification to the University if issues arise that may affect delivery. For reactive requests, the University requires a same working day response to enquiries, with a quotation and agreed delivery timescales within 24 hours. Predominant cleaning method is expected to be reach and wash, however some buildings will require alternative access methods such as rope access/abseiling and MEWPs, and bidders must demonstrate capability to deliver these safely and compliantly.\\nA key operational feature is significant peak demand during defined periods, with a requirement for sufficient staffing, vehicles and equipment to deliver high volumes within short timescales. Quality sign-off is required following completion of cleans (by the University\\u2019s nominated representative). Contractors are responsible for taking due care of University fixtures and fittings and must report any defects discovered (e.g., broken or defective windows, hinges, safety catches) and any accidental damage immediately, in line with contract reporting procedures.\",\"questionnaire_evidence\":[],\"reference\":\"085639-2026\",\"registration_evidence\":[],\"relevance_evidence\":{\"MEWP\":[\"mewp\"]},\"requirement_items\":\"\\n\\nIt is proposed this procurement will be conducted through the use of the Restricted Procedure.\\nThe evaluation process shall be as follows.\\nStage 1- Pre-Qualification via the submission of the completed SPD (Scotland).\\nBidders must pass the minimum standards (pass/fail) sections of the SPD (Scotland). These can be found within the qualification envelope of PCS-T. Statements detailing the specific requirements can be found within Section III 1.1, 1.2 & 1.3 and of the Contract Notice. Bidders must complete the technical envelope in PCS-T. The responses to these statements will be scored as per the scoring methodology. SPD Technical Envelope Scores shall be allocated based on the total percentage achieved by the response out of the maximum possible percentage. This takes into account the score out of 4 and the weighting allocated to individual questions. For example, if a question is weighted 10 percent and your submission scores 3 points out of 4 for that question then you will receive 7.5 percent out of a possible 10 percent.\\nA 50%minimum threshold will apply, whereby only bidders achieving a total score greater or equal to 50% for their responses to the SPD scored questions will be considered for shortlisting. The top six (6) Bidders based on the scored questions will be invited to submit a bid in response to the subsequent Invitation to Tender (ITT). Where the number of bidders meeting the selection criteria is below the minimum number, the University may continue the procedure by inviting the candidates with the required capabilities. In any event, the number of candidates invited shall be sufficient to ensure genuine competition at ITT stage.\\nStage 2- Invitation to Tender (ITT)\\nThe University will evaluate all shortlisted bidders\\u2019 ITT submissions via undertaking a Technical and Commercial evaluation. The ITT will be weighted at 60% Technical and 40% Commercial. The weightings of each technical question will be detailed within the ITT. Technical Scores shall be allocated based on the total percentage achieved by the response out of the maximum possible percentage. This takes into account the score out of 4 and the weighting allocated to individual questions. For example, if a question is weighted 10% and your submission scores 3 points out of 4 for that question then you will receive 7.5% out of a possible 10%. A60%minimum technical threshold will apply (48% after technical weightings are applied).\\nEach bidder achieving a score greater or equal to 50% will only then progress through to the commercial evaluation. For the Commercial evaluation, the Bidder who submits the lowest-cost bid will be awarded the maximum score and others will be awarded a pro rata score in relation to the lowest bid. The technical and commercial scores will then be combined to give each bidder an overall total score and to calculate the winning bidder. Bidders can choose to bid for either one or both Lots. Where a bidder opts to bid for both Lots, they will need to state their preference between Lot 1 and Lot 2. The top scoring Bidder will be appointed to each Lot.\\nIt is proposed this procurement will be conducted through the use of the Restricted Procedure.\\nThe evaluation process shall be as follows.\\nStage 1- Pre-Qualification via the submission of the completed SPD (Scotland).\\nBidders must pass the minimum standards (pass/fail) sections of the SPD (Scotland). These can be found within the qualification envelope of PCS-T. Statements detailing the specific requirements can be found within Section III 1.1, 1.2 & 1.3 and of the Contract Notice. Bidders must complete the technical envelope in PCS-T. The responses to these statements will be scored as per the scoring methodology. SPD Technical Envelope Scores shall be allocated based on the total percentage achieved by the response out of the maximum possible percentage. This takes into account the score out of 4 and the weighting allocated to individual questions. For example, if a question is weighted 10 percent and your submission scores 3 points out of 4 for that question then you will receive 7.5 percent out of a possible 10 percent.\\nA 50%minimum threshold will apply, whereby only bidders achieving a total score greater or equal to 50% for their responses to the SPD scored questions will be considered for shortlisting. The top six (6) Bidders based on the scored questions will be invited to submit a bid in response to the subsequent Invitation to Tender (ITT). Where the number of bidders meeting the selection criteria is below the minimum number, the University may continue the procedure by inviting the candidates with the required capabilities. In any event, the number of candidates invited shall be sufficient to ensure genuine competition at ITT stage.\\nStage 2- Invitation to Tender (ITT)\\nThe University will evaluate all shortlisted bidders\\u2019 ITT submissions via undertaking a Technical and Commercial evaluation. The ITT will be weighted at 60% Technical and 40% Commercial. The weightings of each technical question will be detailed within the ITT. Technical Scores shall be allocated based on the total percentage achieved by the response out of the maximum possible percentage. This takes into account the score out of 4 and the weighting allocated to individual questions. For example, if a question is weighted 10% and your submission scores 3 points out of 4 for that question then you will receive 7.5% out of a possible 10%. A60%minimum technical threshold will apply (48% after technical weightings are applied).\\nEach bidder achieving a score greater or equal to 50% will only then progress through to the commercial evaluation. For the Commercial evaluation, the Bidder who submits the lowest-cost bid will be awarded the maximum score and others will be awarded a pro rata score in relation to the lowest bid. The technical and commercial scores will then be combined to give each bidder an overall total score and to calculate the winning bidder. Bidders can choose to bid for either one or both Lots. Where a bidder opts to bid for both Lots, they will need to state their preference between Lot 1 and Lot 2. The top scoring Bidder will be appointed to each Lot.\",\"selection_requirements\":{\"criteria\":[{\"appliesTo\":[\"supplier\"],\"description\":\"SPD Statement 4B.1.1\\nBidders will be required to have a \\u201cgeneral\\u201d yearly turnover threshold of 85033.12 GBP for Lot 1, 176607.26 GBP for Lot 2 and 261640.38 GBP for both lots combined.\\nSPD 4B.5.1 and 4B.5.2 Statement\\nIt is a requirement of this contract that bidders hold, or can commit to obtain prior to the commencement of any subsequently awarded\\ncontract, the types and levels of insurance indicated below:\\nNote: There is no requirement for separate product liability insurance as the monetary value detailed against public liability insurance is\\ninclusive of both types of insurance.\\nEmployer\\u2019s (Compulsory) Liability Insurance = 10 million GBP per single event\\nPublic Liability Insurance = 5 million GBP per single event\\nProfessional Indemnity Insurance = 2 million GBP per single even\",\"type\":\"economic\"},{\"appliesTo\":[\"supplier\"],\"description\":\"SPD 4C.1.2- Statement 1\\nProvide two (2) examples of window cleaning contracts delivered within the last five (5) years that demonstrate your ability to deliver services across varied building types, including working at height. Examples may include ladder work and rope access where relevant.\\nMandatory information for each example (basis of evaluation/scoring):\\n- Scope/scale (sites/buildings)\\n- Building types and access constraints\\n- Methods used (high level)\\n- H&S controls (high level)\\n- Quality checking/rectification\\n- Scheduling and communications with client/occupants\\n- Operational challenges and how managed.\\nWeight: 50% overall (Each example is worth 25%).\\nSPD 4C.1.2- Statement 2\\nProvide two (2) examples of window cleaning contracts delivered within the last five (5) years that demonstrate your ability to deliver services across varied building types, including working at height. Examples may include ladder work and rope access where relevant.\\nMandatory information for each example (basis of evaluation/scoring):\\n- Scope/scale (sites/buildings)\\n- Building types and access constraints\\n- Methods used (high level)\\n- H&S controls (high level)\\n- Quality checking/rectification\\n- Scheduling and communications with client/occupants\\n- Operational challenges and how managed..\\nWeight: 25%\\nRecruitment, Training & Competence (Working at Height)\\nDescribe your approach to recruitment, training and competence management for window cleaning operatives and supervisors, including assessment of working at height (using the HSE WAH hierarchy) controls for working at height (ladder and rope access if applicable), supervision/monitoring of safe systems of work, and management of agency/temporary staff (if used). Do not include site-specific staffing numbers.\\nWeight:25%\\nService Reliability, Quality Control & Customer Communication Describe how you ensure reliable service delivery and consistent quality over the contract term, including: planning/scheduling (including weather-related impacts), attendance control, quality assurance (inspection regime, snagging/rectification), client communications and sign-off, issue/complaint handling and escalation, and contingency arrangements for short-notice cover (staff or equipment). Do not provide a mobilisation plan (to be requested at ITT).\\nWeight:25%\",\"type\":\"technical\"}]},\"sme_suitability\":[],\"submission_method\":\"https://www.publictendersscotland.publiccontractsscotland.gov.uk/go/8599597501A0867DF3C2\",\"value_excluding_vat\":null,\"value_including_vat\":null,\"value_minimum\":null,\"value_scope\":\"TOTAL_NOTICE_NOT_PURA_ADDRESSABLE\",\"vat_basis\":\"VAT basis not explicit in release\"}",
"inferences_json": "[{\"basis\":{\"MEWP\":[\"mewp\"]},\"type\":\"HIDDEN_ADDRESSABLE_ELEMENT\"}]",
"unknowns_json": "[]",
"confidence": "MEDIUM",
"relevant_services_json": "[{\"confidence\":\"MEDIUM\",\"rationale\":\"mewp\",\"service\":\"MEWP\"}]",
"value_truth": "KNOWN",
"value_band": "HIGH",
"value_min": 560000.0,
"value_max": 560000.0,
"value_currency": "GBP",
"urgency": "BACKGROUND",
"priority": "WATCH",
"recommended_action": "TRACK UNTIL TENDER",
"status": "OPEN",
"notification_state": "NOT_ELIGIBLE",
"feedback_state": "NONE",
"provenance_json": "{\"licence\":\"http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/\",\"ocid\":\"ocds-h6vhtk-061509\",\"release_id\":\"085639-2026\"}",
"data_mode": "LIVE",
"content_digest": "d783a65085cff0dbd7b080512738e4386c8b7ad622569ad1c833e9f804ded942",
"created_at": "2026-10-14T03:00:17+00:00",
"updated_at": "2026-10-14T03:00:17+00:00"
}
],
"classification_history": [
{
"event_type": "DISCOVERED",
"previous_status": null,
"new_status": "EVIDENCED",
"occurred_at": "2026-10-14T03:00:19+00:00",
"reason_json": "{\"kill\":[\"source evidence withdrawn\",\"commercial fit contradicted\",\"route proven impossible\"],\"promotion\":[\"notice text directly evidences a matched Pura capability\"]}"
}
],
"feedback_history": [],
"qualified_projection": {
"id": "98042d6e-f8b0-486a-96ae-91b8dddf1f7d",
"canonical_key": "commercial-opportunity:v1:b68127fd-c269-41bf-ac73-281ca2c7c5b8",
"organisation_id": "f80148a3-a7ce-4b91-ad8e-c353f6882238",
"origin_engine": "TENDER",
"origin_signal_id": "b68127fd-c269-41bf-ac73-281ca2c7c5b8",
"relationship_type": "PUBLIC_BUYER",
"what_happened": "Tender notice from University Of Edinburgh. Relevance is supported by notice evidence.",
"why_it_matters": "Evidence strength, addressability and route are evaluated independently of relationship.",
"potential_need": "MEWP inspection and service",
"current_product_match_json": "[\"MEWP inspection and service\"]",
"capability_match_json": "[{\"capability_id\":\"MEWP\",\"confidence\":\"MEDIUM\",\"currently_sold\":\"YES\",\"name\":\"MEWP inspection and service\"}]",
"new_product_possibility": "NO",
"value_truth": "UNKNOWN",
"value_band": "UNKNOWN",
"probability": "MEDIUM",
"urgency": "BACKGROUND",
"confidence": "MEDIUM — notice scope only",
"evidence_json": "{\"independent_identities\":[\"ocds-h6vhtk-061509\"],\"signal_id\":\"b68127fd-c269-41bf-ac73-281ca2c7c5b8\",\"source\":\"find_a_tender_ocds\"}",
"facts_json": "{\"award_values\":[],\"buyer\":\"University Of Edinburgh\",\"buyer_reference\":\"EC1077\",\"contact_email\":\"sglynn2@ed.ac.uk\",\"contact_name\":\"Steven Glynn\",\"contact_restrictions\":[],\"contacts\":[{\"email\":\"sglynn2@ed.ac.uk\",\"name\":\"Steven Glynn\",\"organisation\":\"University Of Edinburgh\",\"telephone\":\"+44 1316502759\",\"url\":\"https://www.publictendersscotland.publiccontractsscotland.gov.uk/go/8599597501A0867DF3C2\"}],\"contract_terms\":[{\"durationInDays\":720},{\"durationInDays\":720}],\"cpv\":[{\"description\":\"Accommodation, building and window cleaning services\",\"id\":\"90911000\",\"scheme\":\"CPV\"}],\"currency\":\"GBP\",\"days_to_deadline\":-2,\"deadline\":\"2026-10-12T12:00:00+01:00\",\"deadline_conflict\":false,\"deadline_kind\":\"TENDER\",\"deadline_narrative\":\"\",\"deadline_structured\":\"2026-10-12T12:00:00+01:00\",\"deadline_time_unpublished\":false,\"demo_evidence\":[\"Predominant cleaning method is expected to be reach and wash, however some buildings will require alternative access methods such as rope access/abseiling and MEWPs, and bidders must demonstrate capability to deliver these safely and compliantly.\"],\"direct_contact_evidence\":[],\"engagement_route\":\"\",\"estimated_value\":560000,\"expansion_scope\":\"Complete official OCDS release; linked restricted documents require separate verification.\",\"extensions\":[{\"description\":\"There will be two optional 1 year extensions to be taken at the Universities discretion\"},{\"description\":\"There will be two optional 1 year extensions to be taken at the Universities discretion.\"}],\"fully_expanded\":true,\"geographic_scope\":[[{\"region\":\"UKM75\"}],[{\"region\":\"UKM75\"}]],\"hidden_opportunity\":true,\"historical_engagement_evidence\":\"\",\"incumbent_evidence\":[],\"linked_documents\":[],\"lot_count\":2,\"lot_scope\":[{\"description\":\"It is proposed this procurement will be conducted through the use of the Restricted Procedure.\\nThe evaluation process shall be as follows.\\nStage 1- Pre-Qualification via the submission of the completed SPD (Scotland).\\nBidders must pass the minimum standards (pass/fail) sections of the SPD (Scotland). These can be found within the qualification envelope of PCS-T. Statements detailing the specific requirements can be found within Section III 1.1, 1.2 & 1.3 and of the Contract Notice. Bidders must complete the technical envelope in PCS-T. The responses to these statements will be scored as per the scoring methodology. SPD Technical Envelope Scores shall be allocated based on the total percentage achieved by the response out of the maximum possible percentage. This takes into account the score out of 4 and the weighting allocated to individual questions. For example, if a question is weighted 10 percent and your submission scores 3 points out of 4 for that question then you will receive 7.5 percent out of a possible 10 percent.\\nA 50%minimum threshold will apply, whereby only bidders achieving a total score greater or equal to 50% for their responses to the SPD scored questions will be considered for shortlisting. The top six (6) Bidders based on the scored questions will be invited to submit a bid in response to the subsequent Invitation to Tender (ITT). Where the number of bidders meeting the selection criteria is below the minimum number, the University may continue the procedure by inviting the candidates with the required capabilities. In any event, the number of candidates invited shall be sufficient to ensure genuine competition at ITT stage.\\nStage 2- Invitation to Tender (ITT)\\nThe University will evaluate all shortlisted bidders\\u2019 ITT submissions via undertaking a Technical and Commercial evaluation. The ITT will be weighted at 60% Technical and 40% Commercial. The weightings of each technical question will be detailed within the ITT. Technical Scores shall be allocated based on the total percentage achieved by the response out of the maximum possible percentage. This takes into account the score out of 4 and the weighting allocated to individual questions. For example, if a question is weighted 10% and your submission scores 3 points out of 4 for that question then you will receive 7.5% out of a possible 10%. A60%minimum technical threshold will apply (48% after technical weightings are applied).\\nEach bidder achieving a score greater or equal to 50% will only then progress through to the commercial evaluation. For the Commercial evaluation, the Bidder who submits the lowest-cost bid will be awarded the maximum score and others will be awarded a pro rata score in relation to the lowest bid. The technical and commercial scores will then be combined to give each bidder an overall total score and to calculate the winning bidder. Bidders can choose to bid for either one or both Lots. Where a bidder opts to bid for both Lots, they will need to state their preference between Lot 1 and Lot 2. The top scoring Bidder will be appointed to each Lot.\",\"id\":\"2\",\"title\":\"Estates\",\"value\":null},{\"description\":\"It is proposed this procurement will be conducted through the use of the Restricted Procedure.\\nThe evaluation process shall be as follows.\\nStage 1- Pre-Qualification via the submission of the completed SPD (Scotland).\\nBidders must pass the minimum standards (pass/fail) sections of the SPD (Scotland). These can be found within the qualification envelope of PCS-T. Statements detailing the specific requirements can be found within Section III 1.1, 1.2 & 1.3 and of the Contract Notice. Bidders must complete the technical envelope in PCS-T. The responses to these statements will be scored as per the scoring methodology. SPD Technical Envelope Scores shall be allocated based on the total percentage achieved by the response out of the maximum possible percentage. This takes into account the score out of 4 and the weighting allocated to individual questions. For example, if a question is weighted 10 percent and your submission scores 3 points out of 4 for that question then you will receive 7.5 percent out of a possible 10 percent.\\nA 50%minimum threshold will apply, whereby only bidders achieving a total score greater or equal to 50% for their responses to the SPD scored questions will be considered for shortlisting. The top six (6) Bidders based on the scored questions will be invited to submit a bid in response to the subsequent Invitation to Tender (ITT). Where the number of bidders meeting the selection criteria is below the minimum number, the University may continue the procedure by inviting the candidates with the required capabilities. In any event, the number of candidates invited shall be sufficient to ensure genuine competition at ITT stage.\\nStage 2- Invitation to Tender (ITT)\\nThe University will evaluate all shortlisted bidders\\u2019 ITT submissions via undertaking a Technical and Commercial evaluation. The ITT will be weighted at 60% Technical and 40% Commercial. The weightings of each technical question will be detailed within the ITT. Technical Scores shall be allocated based on the total percentage achieved by the response out of the maximum possible percentage. This takes into account the score out of 4 and the weighting allocated to individual questions. For example, if a question is weighted 10% and your submission scores 3 points out of 4 for that question then you will receive 7.5% out of a possible 10%. A60%minimum technical threshold will apply (48% after technical weightings are applied).\\nEach bidder achieving a score greater or equal to 50% will only then progress through to the commercial evaluation. For the Commercial evaluation, the Bidder who submits the lowest-cost bid will be awarded the maximum score and others will be awarded a pro rata score in relation to the lowest bid. The technical and commercial scores will then be combined to give each bidder an overall total score and to calculate the winning bidder. Bidders can choose to bid for either one or both Lots. Where a bidder opts to bid for both Lots, they will need to state their preference between Lot 1 and Lot 2. The top scoring Bidder will be appointed to each Lot.\",\"id\":\"1\",\"title\":\"Accommodation, Catering and Events\",\"value\":null}],\"meeting_evidence\":[\"Where the number of bidders meeting the selection criteria is below the minimum number, the University may continue the procedure by inviting the candidates with the required capabilities.\"],\"notice_type\":\"TENDER\",\"procurement_method\":\"Restricted procedure\",\"procurement_status\":\"active\",\"publication_date\":\"2026-09-10T09:13:06+01:00\",\"published_corrections\":[],\"published_notice_types\":[],\"published_requirement\":\"The University of Edinburgh will shortly be going out to tender via a Restricted Procedure to engage suitably qualified, resourced and experienced suppliers to provide window cleaning services across the estate.\\nThe University of Edinburgh is procuring window cleaning services across a large and diverse estate, including historic listed buildings and modern facilities, spanning multiple campus locations. The requirement is for a prompt, efficient and consistently high-quality service delivered year-round (52 weeks), with capacity to flex to changing priorities and emerging needs. Suppliers are expected to work collaboratively with University representatives and operate in a way that minimises disruption, as many buildings will be occupied during service delivery.\\nWindow cleaning requirements include both planned/programmed cleans and reactive/short-notice cleans. For planned works, cleaning will be scheduled in advance and must be delivered to agreed timescales, with early notification to the University if issues arise that may affect delivery. For reactive requests, the University requires a same working day response to enquiries, with a quotation and agreed delivery timescales within 24 hours. Predominant cleaning method is expected to be reach and wash, however some buildings will require alternative access methods such as rope access/abseiling and MEWPs, and bidders must demonstrate capability to deliver these safely and compliantly.\\nA key operational feature is significant peak demand during defined periods, with a requirement for sufficient staffing, vehicles and equipment to deliver high volumes within short timescales. Quality sign-off is required following completion of cleans (by the University\\u2019s nominated representative). Contractors are responsible for taking due care of University fixtures and fittings and must report any defects discovered (e.g., broken or defective windows, hinges, safety catches) and any accidental damage immediately, in line with contract reporting procedures.\",\"questionnaire_evidence\":[],\"reference\":\"085639-2026\",\"registration_evidence\":[],\"relevance_evidence\":{\"MEWP\":[\"mewp\"]},\"requirement_items\":\"\\n\\nIt is proposed this procurement will be conducted through the use of the Restricted Procedure.\\nThe evaluation process shall be as follows.\\nStage 1- Pre-Qualification via the submission of the completed SPD (Scotland).\\nBidders must pass the minimum standards (pass/fail) sections of the SPD (Scotland). These can be found within the qualification envelope of PCS-T. Statements detailing the specific requirements can be found within Section III 1.1, 1.2 & 1.3 and of the Contract Notice. Bidders must complete the technical envelope in PCS-T. The responses to these statements will be scored as per the scoring methodology. SPD Technical Envelope Scores shall be allocated based on the total percentage achieved by the response out of the maximum possible percentage. This takes into account the score out of 4 and the weighting allocated to individual questions. For example, if a question is weighted 10 percent and your submission scores 3 points out of 4 for that question then you will receive 7.5 percent out of a possible 10 percent.\\nA 50%minimum threshold will apply, whereby only bidders achieving a total score greater or equal to 50% for their responses to the SPD scored questions will be considered for shortlisting. The top six (6) Bidders based on the scored questions will be invited to submit a bid in response to the subsequent Invitation to Tender (ITT). Where the number of bidders meeting the selection criteria is below the minimum number, the University may continue the procedure by inviting the candidates with the required capabilities. In any event, the number of candidates invited shall be sufficient to ensure genuine competition at ITT stage.\\nStage 2- Invitation to Tender (ITT)\\nThe University will evaluate all shortlisted bidders\\u2019 ITT submissions via undertaking a Technical and Commercial evaluation. The ITT will be weighted at 60% Technical and 40% Commercial. The weightings of each technical question will be detailed within the ITT. Technical Scores shall be allocated based on the total percentage achieved by the response out of the maximum possible percentage. This takes into account the score out of 4 and the weighting allocated to individual questions. For example, if a question is weighted 10% and your submission scores 3 points out of 4 for that question then you will receive 7.5% out of a possible 10%. A60%minimum technical threshold will apply (48% after technical weightings are applied).\\nEach bidder achieving a score greater or equal to 50% will only then progress through to the commercial evaluation. For the Commercial evaluation, the Bidder who submits the lowest-cost bid will be awarded the maximum score and others will be awarded a pro rata score in relation to the lowest bid. The technical and commercial scores will then be combined to give each bidder an overall total score and to calculate the winning bidder. Bidders can choose to bid for either one or both Lots. Where a bidder opts to bid for both Lots, they will need to state their preference between Lot 1 and Lot 2. The top scoring Bidder will be appointed to each Lot.\\nIt is proposed this procurement will be conducted through the use of the Restricted Procedure.\\nThe evaluation process shall be as follows.\\nStage 1- Pre-Qualification via the submission of the completed SPD (Scotland).\\nBidders must pass the minimum standards (pass/fail) sections of the SPD (Scotland). These can be found within the qualification envelope of PCS-T. Statements detailing the specific requirements can be found within Section III 1.1, 1.2 & 1.3 and of the Contract Notice. Bidders must complete the technical envelope in PCS-T. The responses to these statements will be scored as per the scoring methodology. SPD Technical Envelope Scores shall be allocated based on the total percentage achieved by the response out of the maximum possible percentage. This takes into account the score out of 4 and the weighting allocated to individual questions. For example, if a question is weighted 10 percent and your submission scores 3 points out of 4 for that question then you will receive 7.5 percent out of a possible 10 percent.\\nA 50%minimum threshold will apply, whereby only bidders achieving a total score greater or equal to 50% for their responses to the SPD scored questions will be considered for shortlisting. The top six (6) Bidders based on the scored questions will be invited to submit a bid in response to the subsequent Invitation to Tender (ITT). Where the number of bidders meeting the selection criteria is below the minimum number, the University may continue the procedure by inviting the candidates with the required capabilities. In any event, the number of candidates invited shall be sufficient to ensure genuine competition at ITT stage.\\nStage 2- Invitation to Tender (ITT)\\nThe University will evaluate all shortlisted bidders\\u2019 ITT submissions via undertaking a Technical and Commercial evaluation. The ITT will be weighted at 60% Technical and 40% Commercial. The weightings of each technical question will be detailed within the ITT. Technical Scores shall be allocated based on the total percentage achieved by the response out of the maximum possible percentage. This takes into account the score out of 4 and the weighting allocated to individual questions. For example, if a question is weighted 10% and your submission scores 3 points out of 4 for that question then you will receive 7.5% out of a possible 10%. A60%minimum technical threshold will apply (48% after technical weightings are applied).\\nEach bidder achieving a score greater or equal to 50% will only then progress through to the commercial evaluation. For the Commercial evaluation, the Bidder who submits the lowest-cost bid will be awarded the maximum score and others will be awarded a pro rata score in relation to the lowest bid. The technical and commercial scores will then be combined to give each bidder an overall total score and to calculate the winning bidder. Bidders can choose to bid for either one or both Lots. Where a bidder opts to bid for both Lots, they will need to state their preference between Lot 1 and Lot 2. The top scoring Bidder will be appointed to each Lot.\",\"selection_requirements\":{\"criteria\":[{\"appliesTo\":[\"supplier\"],\"description\":\"SPD Statement 4B.1.1\\nBidders will be required to have a \\u201cgeneral\\u201d yearly turnover threshold of 85033.12 GBP for Lot 1, 176607.26 GBP for Lot 2 and 261640.38 GBP for both lots combined.\\nSPD 4B.5.1 and 4B.5.2 Statement\\nIt is a requirement of this contract that bidders hold, or can commit to obtain prior to the commencement of any subsequently awarded\\ncontract, the types and levels of insurance indicated below:\\nNote: There is no requirement for separate product liability insurance as the monetary value detailed against public liability insurance is\\ninclusive of both types of insurance.\\nEmployer\\u2019s (Compulsory) Liability Insurance = 10 million GBP per single event\\nPublic Liability Insurance = 5 million GBP per single event\\nProfessional Indemnity Insurance = 2 million GBP per single even\",\"type\":\"economic\"},{\"appliesTo\":[\"supplier\"],\"description\":\"SPD 4C.1.2- Statement 1\\nProvide two (2) examples of window cleaning contracts delivered within the last five (5) years that demonstrate your ability to deliver services across varied building types, including working at height. Examples may include ladder work and rope access where relevant.\\nMandatory information for each example (basis of evaluation/scoring):\\n- Scope/scale (sites/buildings)\\n- Building types and access constraints\\n- Methods used (high level)\\n- H&S controls (high level)\\n- Quality checking/rectification\\n- Scheduling and communications with client/occupants\\n- Operational challenges and how managed.\\nWeight: 50% overall (Each example is worth 25%).\\nSPD 4C.1.2- Statement 2\\nProvide two (2) examples of window cleaning contracts delivered within the last five (5) years that demonstrate your ability to deliver services across varied building types, including working at height. Examples may include ladder work and rope access where relevant.\\nMandatory information for each example (basis of evaluation/scoring):\\n- Scope/scale (sites/buildings)\\n- Building types and access constraints\\n- Methods used (high level)\\n- H&S controls (high level)\\n- Quality checking/rectification\\n- Scheduling and communications with client/occupants\\n- Operational challenges and how managed..\\nWeight: 25%\\nRecruitment, Training & Competence (Working at Height)\\nDescribe your approach to recruitment, training and competence management for window cleaning operatives and supervisors, including assessment of working at height (using the HSE WAH hierarchy) controls for working at height (ladder and rope access if applicable), supervision/monitoring of safe systems of work, and management of agency/temporary staff (if used). Do not include site-specific staffing numbers.\\nWeight:25%\\nService Reliability, Quality Control & Customer Communication Describe how you ensure reliable service delivery and consistent quality over the contract term, including: planning/scheduling (including weather-related impacts), attendance control, quality assurance (inspection regime, snagging/rectification), client communications and sign-off, issue/complaint handling and escalation, and contingency arrangements for short-notice cover (staff or equipment). Do not provide a mobilisation plan (to be requested at ITT).\\nWeight:25%\",\"type\":\"technical\"}]},\"sme_suitability\":[],\"submission_method\":\"https://www.publictendersscotland.publiccontractsscotland.gov.uk/go/8599597501A0867DF3C2\",\"value_excluding_vat\":null,\"value_including_vat\":null,\"value_minimum\":null,\"value_scope\":\"TOTAL_NOTICE_NOT_PURA_ADDRESSABLE\",\"vat_basis\":\"VAT basis not explicit in release\"}",
"inferences_json": "[{\"basis\":{\"MEWP\":[\"mewp\"]},\"type\":\"HIDDEN_ADDRESSABLE_ELEMENT\"}]",
"unknowns_json": "[]",
"recommended_action": "TRACK UNTIL TENDER",
"route_to_market": "TENDER_FRAMEWORK",
"time_to_revenue": "WEEKS",
"ranking_json": "{\"delivery_fit\":3,\"effort\":3,\"evidence_confidence\":2,\"probability\":2,\"relationship_leverage\":1,\"repeatability\":1,\"risk_adjusted\":8,\"time_to_revenue\":3,\"value\":0}",
"status": "EVIDENCED",
"feedback_state": "NONE",
"related_signals_json": "[\"b68127fd-c269-41bf-ac73-281ca2c7c5b8\"]",
"related_tenders_json": "[\"b68127fd-c269-41bf-ac73-281ca2c7c5b8\"]",
"related_contracts_json": "[]",
"provenance_json": "{\"derivation\":\"opportunity-evidence-v2\",\"parent_signal\":\"b68127fd-c269-41bf-ac73-281ca2c7c5b8\"}",
"data_mode": "LIVE",
"content_digest": "4b39ebe1ca4e9be1f0c1c250036a07a0349570e755a6581330f14e464a8c4e0a",
"created_at": "2026-10-14T03:00:19+00:00",
"updated_at": "2026-11-05T10:00:25+00:00",
"opportunity_kind": "COMPANY_SPECIFIC",
"addressability": "DIRECTLY_ADDRESSABLE",
"total_value_truth": "KNOWN",
"total_value_band": "HIGH",
"total_value_min": 560000.0,
"total_value_max": 560000.0,
"total_value_currency": "GBP",
"addressable_value_truth": "UNKNOWN",
"addressable_value_band": "UNKNOWN",
"addressable_value_min": null,
"addressable_value_max": null,
"addressable_value_currency": null,
"evidence_identity_count": 1,
"event_count": 1,
"organisation_count": 1,
"source_count": 1,
"first_evidence_at": "2026-09-10T08:13:06+00:00",
"last_evidence_at": "2026-09-10T08:13:06+00:00",
"evidence_recency": "AGING",
"contradictory_evidence_json": "[]",
"promotion_evidence_json": "[\"notice text directly evidences a matched Pura capability\"]",
"kill_evidence_json": "[\"source evidence withdrawn\",\"commercial fit contradicted\",\"route proven impossible\"]",
"recurring_revenue_type": "UNKNOWN",
"organisation": "University Of Edinburgh",
"FACT": {
"published_requirement": "The University of Edinburgh will shortly be going out to tender via a Restricted Procedure to engage suitably qualified, resourced and experienced suppliers to provide window cleaning services across the estate.\nThe University of Edinburgh is procuring window cleaning services across a large and diverse estate, including historic listed buildings and modern facilities, spanning multiple campus locations. The requirement is for a prompt, efficient and consistently high-quality service delivered year-round (52 weeks), with capacity to flex to changing priorities and emerging needs. Suppliers are expected to work collaboratively with University representatives and operate in a way that minimises disruption, as many buildings will be occupied during service delivery.\nWindow cleaning requirements include both planned/programmed cleans and reactive/short-notice cleans. For planned works, cleaning will be scheduled in advance and must be delivered to agreed timescales, with early notification to the University if issues arise that may affect delivery. For reactive requests, the University requires a same working day response to enquiries, with a quotation and agreed delivery timescales within 24 hours. Predominant cleaning method is expected to be reach and wash, however some buildings will require alternative access methods such as rope access/abseiling and MEWPs, and bidders must demonstrate capability to deliver these safely and compliantly.\nA key operational feature is significant peak demand during defined periods, with a requirement for sufficient staffing, vehicles and equipment to deliver high volumes within short timescales. Quality sign-off is required following completion of cleans (by the University’s nominated representative). Contractors are responsible for taking due care of University fixtures and fittings and must report any defects discovered (e.g., broken or defective windows, hinges, safety catches) and any accidental damage immediately, in line with contract reporting procedures.",
"notice_title": "Window Cleaning Services",
"requirement_items": "\n\nIt is proposed this procurement will be conducted through the use of the Restricted Procedure.\nThe evaluation process shall be as follows.\nStage 1- Pre-Qualification via the submission of the completed SPD (Scotland).\nBidders must pass the minimum standards (pass/fail) sections of the SPD (Scotland). These can be found within the qualification envelope of PCS-T. Statements detailing the specific requirements can be found within Section III 1.1, 1.2 & 1.3 and of the Contract Notice. Bidders must complete the technical envelope in PCS-T. The responses to these statements will be scored as per the scoring methodology. SPD Technical Envelope Scores shall be allocated based on the total percentage achieved by the response out of the maximum possible percentage. This takes into account the score out of 4 and the weighting allocated to individual questions. For example, if a question is weighted 10 percent and your submission scores 3 points out of 4 for that question then you will receive 7.5 percent out of a possible 10 percent.\nA 50%minimum threshold will apply, whereby only bidders achieving a total score greater or equal to 50% for their responses to the SPD scored questions will be considered for shortlisting. The top six (6) Bidders based on the scored questions will be invited to submit a bid in response to the subsequent Invitation to Tender (ITT). Where the number of bidders meeting the selection criteria is below the minimum number, the University may continue the procedure by inviting the candidates with the required capabilities. In any event, the number of candidates invited shall be sufficient to ensure genuine competition at ITT stage.\nStage 2- Invitation to Tender (ITT)\nThe University will evaluate all shortlisted bidders’ ITT submissions via undertaking a Technical and Commercial evaluation. The ITT will be weighted at 60% Technical and 40% Commercial. The weightings of each technical question will be detailed within the ITT. Technical Scores shall be allocated based on the total percentage achieved by the response out of the maximum possible percentage. This takes into account the score out of 4 and the weighting allocated to individual questions. For example, if a question is weighted 10% and your submission scores 3 points out of 4 for that question then you will receive 7.5% out of a possible 10%. A60%minimum technical threshold will apply (48% after technical weightings are applied).\nEach bidder achieving a score greater or equal to 50% will only then progress through to the commercial evaluation. For the Commercial evaluation, the Bidder who submits the lowest-cost bid will be awarded the maximum score and others will be awarded a pro rata score in relation to the lowest bid. The technical and commercial scores will then be combined to give each bidder an overall total score and to calculate the winning bidder. Bidders can choose to bid for either one or both Lots. Where a bidder opts to bid for both Lots, they will need to state their preference between Lot 1 and Lot 2. The top scoring Bidder will be appointed to each Lot.\nIt is proposed this procurement will be conducted through the use of the Restricted Procedure.\nThe evaluation process shall be as follows.\nStage 1- Pre-Qualification via the submission of the completed SPD (Scotland).\nBidders must pass the minimum standards (pass/fail) sections of the SPD (Scotland). These can be found within the qualification envelope of PCS-T. Statements detailing the specific requirements can be found within Section III 1.1, 1.2 & 1.3 and of the Contract Notice. Bidders must complete the technical envelope in PCS-T. The responses to these statements will be scored as per the scoring methodology. SPD Technical Envelope Scores shall be allocated based on the total percentage achieved by the response out of the maximum possible percentage. This takes into account the score out of 4 and the weighting allocated to individual questions. For example, if a question is weighted 10 percent and your submission scores 3 points out of 4 for that question then you will receive 7.5 percent out of a possible 10 percent.\nA 50%minimum threshold will apply, whereby only bidders achieving a total score greater or equal to 50% for their responses to the SPD scored questions will be considered for shortlisting. The top six (6) Bidders based on the scored questions will be invited to submit a bid in response to the subsequent Invitation to Tender (ITT). Where the number of bidders meeting the selection criteria is below the minimum number, the University may continue the procedure by inviting the candidates with the required capabilities. In any event, the number of candidates invited shall be sufficient to ensure genuine competition at ITT stage.\nStage 2- Invitation to Tender (ITT)\nThe University will evaluate all shortlisted bidders’ ITT submissions via undertaking a Technical and Commercial evaluation. The ITT will be weighted at 60% Technical and 40% Commercial. The weightings of each technical question will be detailed within the ITT. Technical Scores shall be allocated based on the total percentage achieved by the response out of the maximum possible percentage. This takes into account the score out of 4 and the weighting allocated to individual questions. For example, if a question is weighted 10% and your submission scores 3 points out of 4 for that question then you will receive 7.5% out of a possible 10%. A60%minimum technical threshold will apply (48% after technical weightings are applied).\nEach bidder achieving a score greater or equal to 50% will only then progress through to the commercial evaluation. For the Commercial evaluation, the Bidder who submits the lowest-cost bid will be awarded the maximum score and others will be awarded a pro rata score in relation to the lowest bid. The technical and commercial scores will then be combined to give each bidder an overall total score and to calculate the winning bidder. Bidders can choose to bid for either one or both Lots. Where a bidder opts to bid for both Lots, they will need to state their preference between Lot 1 and Lot 2. The top scoring Bidder will be appointed to each Lot.",
"procurement_method": "Restricted procedure",
"deadline": "2026-10-12T12:00:00+01:00",
"publication_date": "2026-09-10T09:13:06+01:00",
"notice_type": "TENDER",
"source_url": "https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/085639-2026"
},
"SUPPORTED_INFERENCE": {
"Pura_match_hypothesis": "No specific Pura delivery capability is established by this notice alone."
},
"UNKNOWN": [
"Detailed workflows and acceptance criteria",
"Integration and security requirements",
"Direct contact permission and procurement constraints",
"Proof effort and bounded paid discovery acceptance"
],
"reconstruction_state": "BOUNDED_NOTICE_REVIEW",
"commercially_qualified_solution": false,
"route_class": "TENDER",
"recommendation": "TENDER BID / NO-BID REVIEW",
"proof_opportunity": "UNKNOWN — reconstruct detailed buyer workflow before selecting a proof",
"proof_effort": "UNKNOWN",
"commercial_entry": "Proposed bounded discovery; scope and buyer acceptance UNKNOWN",
"contactability": "Published procurement route only; direct buyer contact UNKNOWN",
"category": "TENDER",
"fit_review": {
"factors": {
"requirement_clarity": 0.65,
"contactability": 0.8,
"capability_fit": 0.1,
"evidence_confidence": 0.85,
"urgency": 0,
"commercial_value": 0.4,
"time_to_cash": 0,
"proof_effort": 0
},
"classification": "UNCONFIRMED",
"fit_reason": "No specific Pura delivery capability is established by this notice alone.",
"diagnostic_scores": {
"opportunity_strength": 46,
"pursuit_readiness": 50
},
"strength_components": {
"need_clarity": 8,
"procurement_seriousness": 12,
"commercial_value": 12,
"timing": 0,
"capability_relevance": 4,
"evidence_confidence": 10
},
"readiness_components": {
"contactability": 10,
"route_clarity": 15,
"deadline_clarity": 10,
"proof_readiness": 0,
"proposition_readiness": 0,
"procurement_restrictions": 0,
"response_mechanism": 15
}
},
"freshness": "LAPSED",
"freshness_reason": "Published deadline has passed.",
"evidence_at": "2026-10-14T03:00:17+00:00",
"contact_evidence": {
"requirement_complete": false,
"high_confidence": false
},
"verified_route": "TENDER_ONLY",
"contact_model": {
"AUTO_CONTACT_ELIGIBLE": false,
"contact_mode": "OWNER APPROVAL REQUIRED",
"threshold": 80,
"gates": {
"requirement_complete": false,
"high_confidence": false,
"buyer_route_verified": false,
"direct_contact_permitted": false,
"procurement_allows_contact": false,
"identity_verified": false,
"proposition_ready": false,
"required_response_ready": false,
"no_duplicate_contact": false,
"no_negative_state": false,
"approved_sender_available": false,
"jurisdiction_satisfied": false,
"live": false,
"score": false,
"direct_route": false
},
"blockers": [
"requirement_complete",
"high_confidence",
"buyer_route_verified",
"direct_contact_permitted",
"procurement_allows_contact",
"identity_verified",
"proposition_ready",
"required_response_ready",
"no_duplicate_contact",
"no_negative_state",
"approved_sender_available",
"jurisdiction_satisfied",
"live",
"score",
"direct_route"
],
"send_authorised": false
},
"owner_state": "UNAPPROVED",
"decision_at": null,
"decision_hash": "dd5e3a0e1f80554248befefc475dbbcf1f744b18257f86b63743a48d2e2a4b4f",
"score": 0,
"score_factors": {
"live_need": 0,
"requirement_clarity": 0.65,
"contactability": 0.8,
"evidence_confidence": 0.85,
"capability_fit": 0.1,
"urgency": 0,
"commercial_value": 0.4,
"time_to_cash": 0,
"proof_effort": 0
},
"quick_win": false,
"evidence_digest": "dd5e3a0e1f80554248befefc475dbbcf1f744b18257f86b63743a48d2e2a4b4f",
"route": "https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/085639-2026"
},
"source_urls_used": [
{
"url": "https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/085639-2026",
"name": "Find a Tender",
"reference": "085639-2026",
"published": "2026-09-10T09:13:06+01:00",
"checked": "2026-10-14T03:00:17+00:00",
"unavailable": false
}
],
"lifecycle_audit": {
"owner_actions": [],
"owner_decision": null,
"requirement_reconstructions": []
}
}